The Coq Proof Assistant

# Library Coq.Logic.ClassicalDescription

This file provides classical logic and definite description, which is equivalent to providing classical logic and Church's iota operator
Classical logic and definite descriptions implies excluded-middle in Set and leads to a classical world populated with non computable functions. It conflicts with the impredicativity of Set
Set Implicit Arguments.
Require Export Classical. Require Export Description. Require Import ChoiceFacts.
Local Notation inhabited A := A (only parsing).
The idea for the following proof comes from ChicliPottierSimpson02
Theorem excluded_middle_informative : forall P:Prop, {P} + {~ P}.
Theorem classical_definite_description :
forall (A : Type) (P : A->Prop), inhabited A ->
{ x : A | (exists! x : A, P x) -> P x }.
Church's iota operator
Definition iota (A : Type) (i:inhabited A) (P : A->Prop) : A
:= proj1_sig (classical_definite_description P i).
Definition iota_spec (A : Type) (i:inhabited A) (P : A->Prop) :
(exists! x:A, P x) -> P (iota i P)
:= proj2_sig (classical_definite_description P i).
Axiom of unique "choice" (functional reification of functional relations)
Theorem dependent_unique_choice :
forall (A:Type) (B:A -> Type) (R:forall x:A, B x -> Prop),
(forall x:A, exists! y : B x, R x y) ->
(exists f : (forall x:A, B x), forall x:A, R x (f x)).
Theorem unique_choice :
forall (A B:Type) (R:A -> B -> Prop),
(forall x:A, exists! y : B, R x y) ->
(exists f : A -> B, forall x:A, R x (f x)).
Compatibility lemmas
Unset Implicit Arguments.
Definition dependent_description := dependent_unique_choice.
Definition description := unique_choice.